The 80/80 rule: Why housing wealth must now be central to every retirement income strategy

We asked Tony Mudd, a senior technical and tax specialist at St. James’s Place, for his thoughts on the way forward for advisers in the face of evolving expectations, and the role of holistic retirement strategies to improve client outcomes.

In his article, Tony introduces the “80/80 rule,” showing that most retirement wealth sits in pensions and property, and explains why these need to be planned together as part of a more joined-up, holistic approach.

In his speech on 20 March 2026, FCA Chief Executive Nikhil Rathi signalled the FCA is moving away from a “risk-free” mindset towards a “risk-aware” framework. Specifically, that Modern pensions policy, must “move beyond simple paternalism” and focus on managing risk with consumers, not for them.

At the core of this new approach is a striking reality: for most households, around 80% of retirement wealth sits in just two places, pensions and housing. Yet for too long these have been planned in silos. Pensions dashboards, rolling out over the coming years, will soon prompt clients to view their entire retirement position as a single “balance sheet issue.” At exactly the same time, the FCA published the Terms of Reference for its Later Life Mortgages Market Study (MS26/1). This study explicitly recognises “broad support for making advice more holistic” and commits the regulator to exploring the barriers that currently prevent it, including adviser capability, product access and distribution models. The market study is positioned as a key catalyst for real regulatory change.

Against this backdrop, fixed-term annuities have emerged as one of the fastest-growing segments of the annuity market. These products, alongside equity release and Retirement Interest Only (RIO) mortgages, offer advisers powerful new tools to construct truly personalised retirement income portfolios. The challenge and the opportunity, for advisers is to stop treating housing wealth and later-life lending as a “last resort” and instead integrate them as core, strategic retirement assets from day one.

The advice gap is real and no longer accessible

Retirement planning conversations still too often default to “pensions only.” Equity release or RIO mortgages are raised unprompted in a tiny fraction of cases. This silo approach no longer aligns with Consumer Duty or the FCA’s clear aspiration for holistic, joined-up advice and failing to consider the full balance sheet risks genuine foreseeable harm.

Clients face real trade-offs:

  • Pension drawdown delivers flexibility and growth potential but exposes them to longevity uncertainty and sequence-of-returns risk (the danger that when clients taking regular withdrawals the timing of investment gains and losses can dramatically affect how long your retirement savings might last).
  • Lifetime or fixed-term annuities provide certainty but reduce liquidity and inheritance flexibility.
  • Housing equity often the largest single asset, remains largely untapped, even though the over-60s collectively hold trillions in property wealth.

Fixed-term annuities: A flexible cornerstone for hybrid income strategies

Fixed-Term Annuities have seen rapid adoption because they address many of the limitations of traditional lifetime annuities while retaining the core benefit of guaranteed income. Importantly, they come in two main variants, giving advisers and clients significant flexibility.

  • Capital-protected (with return of fund / guaranteed maturity amount)

            This version pays a guaranteed income for the chosen term (typically 5–20 years) and then returns a pre-agreed             lump sum (often most or all of the original capital) at the end. The client can then reinvest, move into drawdown,             purchase another annuity, or take the cash. This variant offers a balance between income and capital preservation.

  • Non-protected (higher income, no residual value)

        This version pays a higher guaranteed income for the fixed term, but the annuity simply expires at the end with no         lump sum or residual value returned. It functions more like a pure income stream for a defined period, with the         capital fully utilised during the term.

Key advantages in today’s environment

  • Flexibility and control: Clients (and advisers) can precisely match the term to known future events; state pension age, planned downsizing, care funding needs, or simply a point for future review.
  • Blending potential: Both variants pair exceptionally well with drawdown (for growth on any remaining or returned fund) and later-life lending (for additional liquidity without forced asset sales).
  • Tax and estate planning: Payments are taxed as pension income. The capital-protected version is particularly useful for clients who want to remove funds from the estate in a controlled way.
  • Market growth: Larger pension pots are driving demand, with fixed-term products frequently highlighted as a segment set for continued strong growth as clients seek tailored, non-permanent guarantees.

Practical use cases

  • A 62-year-old with a £450k pension might allocate £180k to a capital-protected 15-year fixed-term annuity. This covers essential spending until state pension and other income kicks in, with most of the capital returned at the end for further planning or inheritance. The remaining fund stays in drawdown, while, if appropriate as part of wider planning, equity release provides a tax-free lump sum.
  • For clients prioritising maximum income in early retirement (e.g. bridging a gap or funding lifestyle), the non-protected variant delivers higher payments during the term, with the trade-off that nothing remains at the end.
  • In High Net Worth (HNW) scenarios (business exit, liquidity event, or inter-generational planning), the choice between variants allows precise timing of income and capital while preserving options. A broad panel of providers ensures the best terms and features for each client’s situation.

Fixed-Term Annuities are not a replacement for lifetime annuities or drawdown; they are a powerful third pillar that enables genuinely hybrid strategies tailored to individual risk tolerance, health, and family circumstances.

The April 2027 Inheritance Tax (IHT) changes: A game-changer for pension planning dynamics

From 6 April 2027, unused pension funds and most pension death benefits will be brought within the scope of Inheritance Tax. This removes the previous IHT-free status of pensions and fundamentally alters the planning calculus. Previously, many clients were advised to preserve pensions for inheritance while spending other assets first. From 2027, that logic is often reversed.

This change dramatically strengthens the case for hybrid strategies. A capital-protected fixed-term annuity removes funds from the estate immediately while providing guaranteed income and returning capital later for further use. The non-protected variant fully utilises the pension during lifetime. Equity release or RIO mortgages can release tax-free cash from the home without triggering immediate IHT or income-tax events, although this will reduce the value of the estate for inheritance, allowing clients to spend down pensions earlier and protect the home for inheritance where appropriate.

Repositioning equity release and RIO mortgages: From ‘last resort’ to core strategic asset

For too long, equity release and RIO mortgages have been positioned and perceived as products of last resort, only to be considered when all other options are exhausted. That mindset must change.

These products are now legitimate, mainstream tools for balance-sheet optimisation:

  • RIO mortgages allow interest to be paid (or rolled up) while the client retains full ownership and can benefit from house-price growth.
  • Equity release (lifetime mortgages) provides a lump sum or drawdown facility with a no-negative-equity guarantee.

In a post-2027 IHT world, using housing wealth earlier can be the most efficient way to fund lifestyle or gifting. The FCA’s Later Life Mortgages Market Study explicitly acknowledges that low awareness and trust limit uptake and positions holistic advice as essential to overcoming these barriers. Advisers who continue to treat later-life lending as an afterthought will leave clients exposed to sub-optimal outcomes and regulatory scrutiny.

A practical five-step framework for advisers

  • Full balance-sheet review – Pensions, property equity, other assets, debts, and future liabilities.
  • Client goals and trade-offs – Income needs, flexibility, inheritance, care funding.
  • Blend solutions – Use the appropriate fixed-term annuity variant for targeted guarantees, drawdown for growth, and equity release/RIO for liquidity.
  • Risk management and documentation – Stress-test, compare providers across a broad panel, record holistic consideration.
  • Specialist collaboration – Leverage qualified equity release and mortgage specialists for best-of-breed solutions.

The way forward

The FCA’s speech, the Later Life Mortgages Market Study, and the 2027 IHT changes together create a powerful regulatory and fiscal imperative for genuine holistic advice. Advisers who embed the 80/80 Rule, treating housing wealth as a core strategic asset rather than a last resort, will deliver measurably better client outcomes, stronger Consumer Duty compliance, and more resilient retirement plans.

This is not about product sales. It is about empowering clients to make confident, informed decisions using their full financial picture. Those who act now, while the market study is live and before the IHT changes take effect, will be best placed to meet the regulator’s expectations and, more importantly, their clients’ evolving needs.

Summary

This growing need for more connected advice underlines the important role advisers play in helping clients make confident, well-informed decisions. At Aviva, we’re committed to supporting advisers with the insight, expertise and solutions they need to deliver more holistic, client-focused retirement outcomes.